This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Greeting · 2 wordsThank you.Greeting Aside · 20 wordsThe Senator appreciates your pronunciation of my home State, which people across America have a hard time often figuring out.Aside Mr. President, Procedure · 14 wordsI am here tonight joining my colleague from Wisconsin on a very serious topic: ProcedureClaims · 31 wordsthat our Nation is at war; that our servicemembers are dying; that for every one who dies, so many are injured--a war that is absolutely hurting us in every possible way. Positioning · 8 wordsOperation Epic Fury has become ``Operation Epic Failure.’’PositioningNo reason given Claims · 25 wordsOn February 28, President Trump and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu launched this unconstitutional war against Iran.1 President Trump was asked how long would this last. Procedure · 2 wordsHe said: ProcedureClaims · 24 words4 or 5 weeks.2 He talked about how our overwhelming military power would produce Iranian leaders who would plead--who would plead--for an unconditional surrender. Mr. President, Claims · 22 words16 weeks later, the war was still going on, but then there was agreement to a 14-point outline of a cease-fire agreement.3 Reasoning · 32 wordsBut because it was just an outline, because the countries hadn’t worked out their different understandings of the points, just as President Trump completely blotched the war, he completely blotched the negotiation; Claims · 27 wordsso it was back to war. President Trump announced new strikes on Iran, and we are now in the 21st week of that 4- to 5-week war.4 Reasoning · 27 wordsTime and time again, leaders think they can launch a war and make a series of assumptions that prove to be wrong, and here we are again. Claims · 66 wordsWe were wrong with the assumption you could occupy Afghanistan and build something resembling a modern democratic nation. We were wrong in spending our resources to attack Iraq, which was a counterbalance to Iran and undid this balance in a way that created Iranian influence through an arc that extended clear across to Lebanon. You know, our Constitution clearly assigns the question of war to Congress. Procedure · 5 wordsSo to my Republican colleagues: ProcedureThe question · 13 wordsWhy aren’t you insisting that Congress make this decision rather than the President? Procedure · 2 wordsMadison summarized: ProcedureClaims · 43 wordsThe Constitution supposes, what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it. [The Constitution] has accordingly, with studied care, vested the question of war in the Legislative [branch]. Reasoning · 51 wordsThat is us. That is us. It is not the President. And the reasoning was that an Executive can too easily make assumptions that something will be quick and easy, but you are committing the lives of our citizens--you are committing the treasure of the Nation--and that should require careful consideration. Claims · 16 wordsOne person alone, our Founders said, should not be able to take a Republic to war. Reasoning · 11 wordsThat is what Kings do. That is what authoritarian strongmen do. Claims · 22 wordsBut we are not--need I remind you--a strongman authoritarian state--at least we are not by our Constitution. We are a democratic Republic, The ask · 15 wordsso let’s start acting like it and let’s start honoring the structure of our Constitution. Claims · 10 wordsThat structure assigns the power of the purse to Congress. The ask · 49 wordsSo every single Senator should be down here protesting when the President cancels a program that has been authorized and funded. Every single Senator should be down here protesting when the President creates a slush fund to do projects that are not authorized and not funded--that is our responsibility. Claims · 83 wordsUnfortunately, this Chamber has failed, for the most part, to defend its role and to defend the Constitution. We did have a concurrent resolution under the War Powers Act that directed the President to remove United States forces from hostilities with Iran, 5but the majority has acted like we didn’t actually pass it, and the President has acted like it wasn’t passed. And the majority has failed to protest to the President that he is not respecting the fact that it was passed. Positioning · 10 wordsIf you can’t stand behind the acts of this Chamber, PositioningClaims · 304 wordsif you can’t stand behind the Constitution, then how far off track are we as a nation? We just got through with a conversation about the fact that this Congress asked for a coin to be minted that reflected the values of our Nation upon our 250 years since our Declaration of Independence, but instead Trump did what dictators do, just as Caesar broke Roman tradition to put his face on a coin and to declare dictator forever, ``dictator in perpetuity,’’ just as King George III put his face on a coin to reflect that power came from him down to the people rather than flowing up from the people--that is a mega difference between an authoritarian state and a democratic republic. The consequences of Trump’s war of choice and the consequences of the Republican leadership’s failure to exert their constitutional responsibility to end President Trump’s war of choice is that 18 servicemembers are dead and hundreds and hundreds of Americans are badly injured.6 Thousands of Iranian civilians are dead--including a whole lot of children, many of whom died from a strike by America, by President Trump’s team, on a girl’s elementary school.7 The war strengthened Iran’s hardliners--that is what happens when you assassinate the religious leaders and the political leaders--people rally to their country. It weakened Iran’s reformers who wanted to see a different path for their nation. It enriched Russia. In fact, President Trump proceeded to say that we would no longer enforce the restriction on the Russian sale of oil so they could sell at the world price.8 Billions and billions of dollars flowed into Russia because of this war--billions and billions of dollars that could be used in the war against Ukraine. That is a war started by a dictatorship against a democratic republic that we should be standing with. The ask · 19 wordsWe should be standing with the people of Ukraine, not enriching Russia to buy more weapons to attack them. Claims · 268 wordsThe taxpayers, they are certainly losers--$40 billion of national treasure was the estimate given to us yesterday from the Secretary of Defense.9 And by all estimates, that doesn’t include repairing all of the facilities damaged throughout the Middle East that the United States is involved in.Unearned certainty Before the war, the Strait of Hormuz was open. Now it is closed.10 That certainly doesn’t benefit us or the world. It has driven up the cost of gas; it has driven up the inflation rate. So Americans, in addition to $40 billion of their collective treasure, are paying out of their pocket so much more at the pump. The price in Oregon has been over $5 a gallon.11 Farmers, they have lost too. They were already hit hard by the tariffs, but now they are hit by the high diesel prices to operate their machinery and by the high cost of fertilizer, all of which could be envisioned if there had been a debate here over whether we should go to war with Iran. We would have heard from the experts who would say: You understand the Strait of Hormuz is a very narrow channel, and Iran has cruise missiles that can proceed to hit ships in the strait, so they have cards to play. We would have debated that if we had had that debate and carried out our constitutional responsibility. We would have observed that that would have a horrific impact on American families. We would have observed that it would have a terrible impact on American farmers. But we didn’t observe that because we didn’t hold the debate. Procedure · 3 wordsBut, say you: ProcedurePositioning · 8 wordsDid we not hold oversight hearings at least?Positioning Claims · 44 wordsNot a single one--another failure of our constitutional responsibility. This group of Senators, through the committees, not a single oversight hearing of the war. President Trump promised to lower prices and end wars, but he has raised prices, and he has started a war. Procedure · 5 wordsTrump posted on Truth Social: ProcedureClaims · 16 wordsFrom the beginning, President Trump thought the power to bomb was his ace up his sleeve. Positioning · 8 wordsIs President Trump a strategic analyst of wars?Positioning Claims · 94 wordsNo. He just had this instinct--his gut--saying: We have more bombs than they do, so they will fold. But he was wrong. And through this campaign, he just keeps repeating the same thing: If they don’t do what we want, we will bomb them even more. We will bomb them even more--the echo time and time and time again. In the beginning, Trump said this war was one we entered because Binyamin Netanyahu was going to bomb Iran anyway, and there would be retaliation so we might as well join the war with him. Positioning · 11 wordsThat was the justification for the United States going to war?Positioning Procedure · 6 wordsEventually, he got around to saying: ProcedureClaims · 162 wordsThis is about the nuclear materials and making sure that they don’t make a nuclear bomb. Our Director of National Intelligence had been very clear that Iran had never made a decision to build a bomb.12 And the basic measures to prevent them from having a bomb--getting rid of their highly enriched uranium and moving it out of their country under international supervision; having the IAEA--the International Atomic Energy Agency--monitor everything they do; dismantle their plutonium nuclear reactor--all those measures were already done by an international agreement supported by five major powers--Britain and France and China and Russia and the United States--all together, insisting that these measures were necessary to make sure Iran never got a bomb.13 So they did all those things. They dismantled their nuclear reactor-- their plutonium nuclear reactors called a rock reactor--and they proceeded to ship their highly enriched uranium out, and they let in all of the inspectors, and they followed all the rules of the centrifuges. Positioning · 18 wordsAnd who tore up that agreement and created a pathway for Iran to potentially covertly pursue a bomb?Positioning Claims · 222 wordsThat man is President Trump. So President Trump destroys the international agreement that prevents pursuit of a nuclear weapon and then proceeds to start a war to achieve the same result. And then he discovers the war doesn’t work, so he has a 14-point plan. Well, that plan kind of was jaw-dropping, particularly to my Republican colleagues. It called for America to organize an international Marshall Plan for Iran with some $300-plus million of help. It called for immediate access for Iran to some $24 billion of funds--after they had spent a decade complaining about Iran getting access to $1.5 billion, under the previous agreement, of its own money.14 What is $1.5 billion compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars that Trump was providing to Iran in the 14-point agreement? Now we are hearing reports that homes have been hit, schools have been hit, hospitals have been hit. We are taking out bridges. The President is bragging about doing that. There was a report that two desalination plants have been hit in Iran. We don’t have confirmation of it. I asked the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff yesterday if indeed we had targeted or hit desalination plants.15 He said he didn’t know but that he would get back to us. So I am looking forward to getting that information. Procedure · 5 wordsAnd why is that important?Procedure Claims · 13 wordsBecause targeting a desalination plant is widely considered to be a war crime. Aside · 7 wordsSo I hope those reports are wrong.Aside Procedure · 6 wordsWhy is it a war crime?Procedure Claims · 58 wordsBecause destroying access to drinkable water-- and one of these plants was reported to serve some 10,000 people in 20 villages--is considered unacceptable under international law. That is why it is a war crime--because it is not a strategic military objective, unless forcing people to have no access to water is a war strategy, which it is not. Aside · 18 wordsI hope that report is wrong. I hope it is not the case that we targeted desalination plants.Aside Claims · 55 wordsIran is reported to have targeted a desalination plant as well. So the war is potentially devolving here as we are hitting more and more things that affect civilian life as well as having killed thousands of civilians directly. The laws of war prohibit attacks on objects indispensable to civilian survival, including water and food. Procedure · 4 wordsSo where are we?Procedure Claims · 50 wordsTrump now claims the main mission of this war is to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. But Iran’s highly enriched uranium--that it only has because he tore up the agreement that prevented them from having that--is buried deep underground, so there is no easy way to extract it. Positioning · 17 wordsIf there is no easy way to extract it, how is this war supposed to solve that?Positioning Claims · 118 wordsSo the administration now believes negotiations are essential to be able to withdraw because there is no military answer. Maybe if we had had a debate here in Congress, we would have discussed the fact that there was no military strategy that would result in the extraction of that highly enriched uranium, that it would have to be done by agreement. So we are in the fifth month of Trump trying to bomb his way to an answer, the fifth month of that strategy failing. Negotiators and facilitators of negotiators have proceeded to suggest a 10-day cease-fire to enable return to try to work out some of the details from that previous 14-point outline to solve this war.16 Reasoning · 25 wordsI support that effort because the path we are on is hurting America in every possible way and hurting a whole lot of civilians overseas. The ask · 71 wordsSo let’s embrace and exercise our constitutional responsibility and pass Senator Van Hollen’s War Powers Resolution to end this reckless war of choice. If the President ignores it after we have passed it, then let’s collectively insist on defending the role of the Senate and the House under our Constitution to be the place where the decisions are made about going to war. It is time that we honor our responsibility. Claims · 49 wordsI know there are a lot of Members who don’t want to have to have that debate because they are afraid they will get it wrong--they will make a vote for war and it will be a disaster or they will vote against war and their constituents will disagree. Positioning · 6 wordsBut shirking the responsibility is unacceptable.Positioning The ask · 18 wordsSo strap your big-boy pants on and do the work we were elected under our Constitution to do.
Analyzed on