Steve Scalise

Mr. Chairman, Greeting · 46 wordsI thank my dear colleague from Texas for yielding. I am truly going to miss him, but he has got a lot of great work left to do as the chairman of the Committee on the Budget, not the least of which is this important resolution, GreetingProcedure · 18 wordswhich is being brought forward, Mr. Chairman, a resolution that is critical to ensuring the hallmark of democracy, ProcedurePositioning · 104 wordsand that is the right to vote: one person, one vote. If we look at all of the things that we have been working with President Trump to do to make life more affordable for working families, over and over again, we see nothing but obstruction from Democrats. It is sad to say. It is sad to see. The American people are watching a party that has become a rudderless ship running off the left edge, socialists taking over. Watching what is going on to that other party, look at some of the things we have been able to do, even with their obstruction: PositioningClaims · 44 wordsworking to produce more energy in America so we can lower costs for American families, while every Democrat voted no, and working to lower tax rates for working families. Yes, no tax on overtime is a benefit that has helped over 30 million Americans.¹ Positioning · 14 wordsThese aren’t the millionaires and the billionaires that Democrats go fight for every day.Positioning Claims · 18 wordsThese are hardworking families making under $100,000 a year, many of them shift workers and law enforcement officers. Positioning · 28 wordsMaybe they voted against that bill because they want to defund the police, not help police officers and firefighters have a little bit more money in their pockets.Positioning Claims · 29 wordsWith no tax on overtime, no tax on tips, somebody making $32,000 a year on average has thousands more in their pocket now because of the work Republicans did.² Positioning · 8 wordsHow did Republicans pay for it, Mr. Chairman?Positioning Claims · 164 wordsIt was paid for by putting antifraud measures in that bill--yes, going after theft of American taxpayer dollars and not just small-time folks. There are foreign countries operating with criminal organizations in States like Minnesota. We saw it. We documented it. It couldn’t be stopped because we needed the measures.Hidden agency We tried to work with Democrats on it, but for whatever reason, every step of the way they blocked it. They blocked it until we put it in the reconciliation bill.⁴ Then when the tools were in place, President Trump was able to go out and recoup not millions but billions and tens of billions of dollars that we were able to take out of the hands of people stealing your money, and we put it in the pockets of hardworking families. Overtime workers, waiters, waitresses, senior citizens who now have a tax credit, all of that we paid for with money that was being stolen. Every step of the way, Democrats opposed it. Positioning · 26 wordsThey would rather the theft of your tax dollars go to fraudsters than hardworking families have their money back. Their obstruction is nothing new, Mr. Chairman.Positioning Procedure · 8 wordsThen we get to today, where we say: ProcedurePositioning · 111 wordsShouldn’t we make sure our men and women in uniform have the tools they need to do their job safely? Shouldn’t we make sure that our farmers get the relief they need so we can keep working to lower food costs? Oh, by the way, can’t we ensure the integrity of the American vote? These are basic things that most Americans understand. Democrats in Washington don’t. They go back home and give Fourth of July speeches. Then they get on an airplane, and a transformation happens. They get up here, and they start voting against the wishes of the American people over and over again. Why? Not just to defend fraudsters.Positioning Claims · 42 wordsIf we know that requiring a picture ID, just something so basic that every American understands--which, by the way, those same Democrats have to show that picture ID to get on the airplane to come up here and vote for socialist policies. Positioning · 25 wordsBut they don’t want that to be the case when you vote. They would say: Don’t worry. There is no fraud. There is no fraud.Positioning Claims · 73 wordsWell, why is it just that today’s New York Post uncovered yet again what we have known all along?Unearned certainty In New Jersey, they just admitted 6,600 noncitizens are on their rolls, many of them voting, voting in elections, illegals on their rolls voting.³ They document in this article many elections that were decided by just a small number of votes. In fact, the margin of the theft, the stolen votes are that margin. Reasoning · 10 wordsThis can be stopped just by requiring a picture ID. Positioning · 21 wordsThen some would say, well, then, why would anybody be against that? They will hide behind all of these other ruses, PositioningClaims · 5 wordsbut they will vote ``no.’’ Procedure · 9 wordsWe have got a bill later today to say: <sup>6</sup>ProcedureClaims · 44 wordsWell, let’s ban Members of Congress from trading stocks, and people are going to watch the board on an issue that every American understands. Almost every Democrat is going to vote ``no.’’⁵ People will say why is that? Because it requires a photo ID. Aside · 48 wordsWhat is so harmful about that? A person can’t go get an unlimited bowl of pasta at Olive Garden without showing a photo ID. Can we at least have the Olive Garden standard when we protect democracy and the franchise that we have to keep this great democracy?Aside Claims · 14 wordsThat is just requiring that you prove you are who you say you are. Positioning · 73 wordsThis, Mr. Chairman, is such a fundamental principle. It is not hard to explain to the American people, but it is actively opposed by Democrats in Congress. It just begs the question: Why? Who are they protecting? Who are they protecting with the ``no’’ vote, Mr. Chairman? If they know illegals are voting in many of these States where they don’t require photo ID, then why would they vote against the requirement? Why?Positioning Procedure · 5 wordsIt is a great question.Procedure Claims · 21 wordsEvery American, Mr. Chairman, is going to be able to watch this vote and know where their Member of Congress is. Positioning · 34 wordsIt is critically important for accountability that we all stand up and be counted.Off point I am strongly for this. I think it is critical we protect the sanctity of every American’s right to vote.Positioning Reasoning · 53 wordsIf somebody else is stealing your vote because they are voting illegally-- thousands in New Jersey--then it takes away your right to vote, Mr. Chairman. We ought to be protecting everybody’s right to vote, especially those people who are legally allowed to vote, not people who shouldn’t be allowed by law to vote.Off point The ask · 25 wordsLet’s pass this important resolution and get it over to the Senate so they can do their job and get this to the President’s desk.