Marsha Blackburn

Mr. President, Procedure · 8 wordsI rise today with a very simple request: ProcedureThe ask · 26 wordsI am asking that the Senate speak with a unanimous voice in condemning one of the worst acts of judicial misconduct we have seen in years. Claims · 115 wordsJudge Eleanor Ross has been a district judge in the Northern District of Georgia for over a decade, ¹and it is clear that she engaged in conduct that falls beneath the dignity of her high office in the Federal judiciary. After a courageous law clerk came forward, a special committee on the Eleventh Circuit was appointed and ultimately made several deeply disturbing findings. First, based on testimony from Judge Ross’ law clerks, the committee found that over the course of 2 years, Judge Ross engaged in a sexual relationship with a high-ranking official of the Atlanta Police Department.² This conduct occurred in her judicial chambers during normal business hours within earshot of her law clerks.³ Procedure · 4 wordsNow, think about that.Procedure Claims · 282 wordsOn top of that, the Atlanta Police Department, in the words of the special committee, ``undoubtably was involved in numerous criminal and civil cases being litigated’’ in the Northern District, underscoring how reckless the judge’s misconduct truly was.<sup>4</sup> Not only did this misconduct create a possibility of an appearance of impropriety, an affair like this also exposed Judge Ross to the possibility of extortion and blackmail, as the special committee noted. In addition to this egregious behavior in her chambers, the special committee also found an equally disturbing act of judicial misconduct: making false statements material to the committee’s investigation. Judge Ross told the Eleventh Circuit’s chief judge that she ``never engaged in sexual intercourse in [her] office, nor anywhere else in the Courthouse’’ and that she was ``astounded and confused’’ to be accused of this misconduct.<sup>5</sup> Now, based on the committee’s findings, we know that Judge Ross’ statements to Chief Judge Pryor were patently false. They were knowingly false. We also know that it took Judge Ross nearly 2 weeks to retract the false statements.<sup>6</sup> By the time she finally backtracked, the special committee had already collected substantial evidence that proved Judge Ross had made false statements. In short, once Judge Ross realized where the investigation was going, she decided to retract her false statements and admit to the misconduct allegations. The Judicial Code of Conduct explicitly prohibits the type of conduct that Judge Ross engaged in, specifically Canon 2 states that ``a Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all Activities.’’⁷ Canon 2A states that ``a judge should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.’’⁸ Procedure · 5 wordsCommentary to Canon 2A states: ProcedureClaims · 64 wordsThe committee’s findings, which I have just outlined, show that Judge Ross blatantly violated all three of these judicial canons. Now, I want to be clear, what I have just outlined is all that my resolution is asking that the Senate condemn. We are condemning this inappropriate sexual misconduct by a sitting Federal judge, and we are condemning her subsequent lying about that misconduct. Procedure · 3 wordsThat is it.Procedure Claims · 43 wordsI do want to note for the record that there was misconduct in the Eleventh Circuit report that I have not included in the resolution. The committee included in its misconduct findings that Judge Ross attended a political function for DA Fani Willis.⁹ Positioning · 31 wordsI find it unconscionable for a sitting Federal judge to have attended a partisan event with a district attorney who weaponized the judicial system in the way that Fani Willis did.PositioningUnearned certainty Claims · 52 wordsI also firmly believe that Judge Ross, by lying to Chief Judge Pryor during the course of the Eleventh Circuit’s investigation committed an impeachable offense, Logical leapand I fully support the House’s impeachment efforts. But I have not included those aspects in my resolution that I am about to ask unanimous consent for. Procedure · 3 wordsThe reason why?Procedure Reasoning · 21 wordsAs I mentioned at the outset, I believe the Senate should speak with one voice and unanimously condemn Judge Ross’ conduct. Positioning · 15 wordsI don’t want to give my Democrat colleagues any reason to object to this resolution.Positioning The ask · 10 wordsSo what I am asking unanimous consent for is simple: Claims · 17 wordsa condemnation of Judge Ross’ sexual misconduct and subsequent lying during the course of a judicial investigation. Reasoning · 30 wordsThe American people deserve Federal judges who uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism on the bench; not those who turn their chambers into a venue for extramarital affairs. The ask · 15 wordsThere is no reason any Member of this body should object to that resolution today. Mr. President, Procedure · 2 wordswith that, ProcedureThe ask · 62 wordsas if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent the Senate proceed to the consideration of S.¹⁰ Res. 808, which is at the desk; I further ask that the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and that the motions to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table with no intervening action or debate.