← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Reasoning and Clarity is 50. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down. 30 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
82 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Reasoning
43 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
76 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 62% Positioning 14% Reasoning 21% Procedure 3%
Structure · 8 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 36 words I would encourage my colleagues on the left side of the aisle to read Martina Navratilova’s X account today, talking about how confirming she was a woman was not invasive.1 It was a simple cheek swab.2 Positioning · 19 words This is the fear politics of the left, and that says a lot about how far they have gone. Positioning Reasoning · 51 words To say that trans kids just want to be on a team with our little girls, if there is a tranny on a team with our daughters, they need to be kicked right off. No reason given If they are in a locker room with our girls, they need to be kicked right out. Claims · 119 words We have seen some really crazy stories of grown men with beards shaving at the sink with little girls in towels in the corner of the locker room scared to death and vulnerable to sexual predators. Logical leap Unearned certainty We all know the tranny thing really is about sexual gratification. Unearned certainty Sexual attraction to being dressed as a woman has nothing to do with them thinking that they are a woman. In fact, they are mocking being a woman. Unearned certainty They are mocking our femininity, and they are mocking the rights that we fought for for hundreds and hundreds of years. It has not been long since women actually got the right to vote.3 There are still ceilings to be broken in this country. Positioning · 15 words It is not going to be done by some mentally ill man in a skirt. Positioning Off point Mr. Chair, Procedure · 8 words I yield back the balance of my time. Procedure
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×16 Positioning ×3 Unearned certainty ×3 No reason given Logical leap Procedure Off topic None of this speech addressed the bill under debate and what it would change.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 82
4 of 25 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is the fear politics of the left,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and that says a lot about how far they have gone.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is not going to be done by some mentally ill man in a skirt.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I yield back the balance of my time.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 0
16 of 25 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I would encourage my colleagues on the left side of the aisle to read Martina Navratilova’s X account today, talking about how confirming she was a woman was not invasive.” Attacks political opponents over a social media post rather than addressing any defense policy in the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It was a simple cheek swab.” Continues the aside about a cheek swab with no connection to the bill’s defense provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is the fear politics of the left,” A partisan point about opponents’ politics, not the legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and that says a lot about how far they have gone.” Partisan commentary unrelated to the defense authorization bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “To say that trans kids just want to be on a team with our little girls,” Shifts to transgender athletes in school sports, a topic outside the bill’s defense policies.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “if there is a tranny on a team with our daughters, they need to be kicked right off.” Speaks to removing transgender athletes from teams, not any provision of the NDAA.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “If they are in a locker room with our girls, they need to be kicked right out.” Continues the locker-room topic rather than the defense bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have seen some really crazy stories of grown men with beards shaving at the sink with little girls in towels in the corner of the locker room scared to death and vulnerable to sexual predators.” Anecdotes about locker rooms, unrelated to the bill’s defense authorizations.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We all know the tranny thing really is about sexual gratification.” Claims about transgender identity generally, with no tie to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Sexual attraction to being dressed as a woman has nothing to do with them thinking that they are a woman.” Discussion of gender identity unrelated to the defense legislation under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, they are mocking being a woman.” Rhetorical claim about mocking womanhood, outside the bill’s subject matter.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They are mocking our femininity,” Continues the theme of mocking femininity, not the defense bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and they are mocking the rights that we fought for for hundreds and hundreds of years.” Commentary on women’s rights generally rather than the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It has not been long since women actually got the right to vote.” Historical aside about voting rights with no connection to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There are still ceilings to be broken in this country.” General remark about ceilings to break, unrelated to defense authorization.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is not going to be done by some mentally ill man in a skirt.” Insult tied to the transgender theme, not any provision of the bill.
Reasoning · 43
2 of 25 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “if there is a tranny on a team with our daughters, they need to be kicked right off.” After striking the slur and the ‘mentally ill’ epithet, what remains is bare assertion plus the cheek-swab anecdote in c2-c3, which does not connect to team participation.
Logical leap A conclusion that does not follow from the reasons given for it. What the tags mean → “We have seen some really crazy stories of grown men with beards shaving at the sink with little girls in towels in the corner of the locker room scared to death and vulnerable to sexual predators.” Clause 9 offers a single anecdotal story as support for removing all transgender people from locker rooms, one example carrying a general claim.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “if there is a tranny on a team with our daughters, they need to be kicked right off.”
Because No reason given
Conclusion “If they are in a locker room with our girls, they need to be kicked right out.”
Because “We have seen some really crazy stories of grown men with beards shaving at the sink with little girls in towels in the corner of the locker room scared to death and vulnerable to sexual predators.”
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 76
3 of 25 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We have seen some really crazy stories” Asserts anecdotes without naming any source, story, or occasion.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “We all know” Appeals to shared knowledge in place of any evidence for the claim.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “In fact” Uses a certainty formula to assert a claim about others’ motives without a source.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “read Martina Navratilova’s X account today, talking about how confirming she was a woman was not invasive” On the day of the speech (2026-07-21), Martina Navratilova posted on X saying that confirming she was a woman was not invasive. search 2 “It was a simple cheek swab.” The method Navratilova described for confirming she was a woman was a cheek swab. search 3 “It has not been long since women actually got the right to vote.” Women in the United States received the right to vote relatively recently in the country’s history. search
